The US Supreme Court’s EPA Ruling: Looking Ahead
August 3, 2022
As the world grapples with intensifying climate impacts, nations, negotiators, and citizens alike looked forward to the Conference of the Parties (COP30) summit at Belem, Brazil. The conference garnered significant attention, owing to the slow pace of progress on climate action and the urgent need to accelerate it to limit global warming to less than 2 °C
Why COP30 Mattered More Than Ever
Conference of the Parties (COP) refers to the annual meeting of the countries that are signatories to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of 1992. COP30 was the 30th such annual meeting, held in 2025. The COP30 was significant because it marked the 10-year anniversary of the historic Paris Agreement (PA) which set out commitments to restrict global warming to less than 2°C above pre-industrial levels. The Paris Agreement established ‘Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC),’ which are voluntary emission reduction targets defined, implemented, and periodically updated by countries.
The Conference of the Parties held after the Paris Agreement have focused on shaping the implementation mechanisms to enable timely achievement of the targets. At COP28 in 2023, parties conducted the first Global Stocktake, mandated under Article 14 of PA, to evaluate collective progress towards the Paris targets. Predictably, the stocktake concluded that the measures taken so far have proven inadequate to meet the ambitious target of 1.5 °C. With the world watching for stronger resolve, COP30 sought to build upon these findings and establish renewed action plans to accelerate the transition.
Key Themes and Focus Areas
COP30 Presidency articulated the results of the first Global Stocktake into 30 objectives covered by six thematic areas. The ambitious blueprint sought to translate the lessons from COP28 to collective global action. At first, the aim was to reduce emissions from the energy and transportation sector that contribute to 75% of global emissions. This involved migrating away from fossil fuels and towards renewables, aiming at triple the installed capacity. In tandem, it also aimed to provide universal access to energy and deploy energy-efficient and low-emission technologies.
The second theme focused on the conservation and restoration of the Earth’s most powerful carbon sinks—forests and oceans. The third theme related to the integration of sustainability and resilience into agriculture and food systems. A climate resilient agriculture is a prerequisite for universal and equitable food security because climate change is expected to reduce yield by 30% and push millions into poverty. Meanwhile, the fourth theme tackled the rapid urbanization challenge—with nearly 68% of the population projected to reside in urban areas by 2050—calling for sustainable infrastructure and efficient water and waste management.
The fifth theme of social and human development focused on alleviating hunger and poverty, ensuring health security, and creating jobs related to climate change mitigation. Finally, the sixth theme encompassed the enabling pillars of governance, finance, business, and technology that support progress on all the other five themes.
What the Global Community Expected from COP30?
The renewed Nationally Determined Contributions, known as NDC 3.0, are due for submission in 2025 by the parties. Following the findings from the stocktake, there were expectations for strong NDC commitments and transformative action plans for accelerated emission reductions. At the same time, parties—especially the developing countries—expected the COP30 presidency to advance the implementation of the New Collective Quantified Goal of $300 billion required for climate finance annually from developed economies. It is worth noting that the contribution falls short of the benchmark, with just $116 billion mobilized in 2022. In addition, parties expected COP30 to operationalize the initial allocation of $250 million from the Loss and Damage Fund with a request for proposal
Another major expectation of COP30 was to delineate the key indicators for measuring the progress on the Global Goal of Adaptation (GGA). Paris Agreement Article 7 established GGA to strengthen adaptation and resilience to climate change. For the implementation of Article 7, COP28 adopted the UAE framework that outlines 11 targets for climate adaptation and resilience. However, progress on National Adaptation Plans and mobilization of finance remained uneven due to a lack of a unified indicator framework. This necessitated a strong set of indicators to measure progress, which COP 30 was expected to advance
Challenges on the Road Before COP30
The immediate challenge that threatened the objectives of COP30 was the staggered submission of NDC 3.0. If we consider the 195 parties to the Paris Agreement, only 61 countries submitted their renewed commitments as of September 2025. It was also appalling to note that all 14 countries that have strengthened their targets compared to NDC 2.0. were developing/least-developed economies. The developed economies except UK and Japan did not even specify a timeline for phase out of fossil fuels, that contributed to 90% of CO2 emissions. In the long term, this would pose a major challenge to restrict the temperature rise to less than 2 °C.
Another key challenge would be bridging the staggering gap in climate finance. Studies estimate an annual requirement of $4–6 trillion for financing the climate initiatives. However, current global financial flow is limited to $1–1.3 trillion per year. As highlighted earlier, developed economies contributed just $116 billion in 2022 against the NCQG target of $300 billion per year. Adding to the complexity, biodiversity conservation also faced a financing gap of $700 billion. Considering these shortfalls, scaling up financial flows was a critical priority and a challenge for COP30.
In addition, the global climate governance landscape faced instabilities such as a major developed economy like the USA withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, erosion of international cooperation, nationalism that focuses on resource-intensive development, and disbeliefs in climate change.
Mixed Outcomes of COP30: Momentum without Mandate
At first, NDCs 3.0, considered to be the most significant collective milestone, have been submitted by only 120 countries. What is even more concerning is that the combined contributions could only reduce 3.4 GT of CO2e against the target of 27.8 GT by 2035 for the 1.5 °C limit. As regards the core priority of finalizing the indicators for the Global Goal of Adaptation (GGA), COP30 zeroed in on 59 indicators, focused around the seven key themes. However, countries have expressed concerns about dilution from the 100 indicators proposed by independent experts and not reflecting the realities of developing economies
While the conference faltered on setting NDCs and GGA indicators, it advanced major initiatives to accelerate climate action. COP30 launched the ‘Global Implementation Accelerator (GIA)’ mechanism that helps countries overcome technical, capacity building, financial, and policy barriers. While GIA is meant to offer assistance and facilitate, the ‘Belem Mission to 1.5 °C’ seeks to not only encourage enhancement of NDC targets, but also mobilize investments for helping various countries achieve their enhanced targets.
To bridge the financing gap towards $1.3 trillion commitment, COP30 has come up with the ‘Baku to Belem Roadmap 1.3T’. It seeks to channelize financial flows from governments, multilateral institutions, and private players through climate-aligned national budgets, blended finance, carbon markets, thematic bonds, and PPPs, supported by risk guarantees. The conference also called for tripling the adaptation finance by 2035. Advancing from commitment to implementation, COP 30 invited requests for proposals for disbursement from the Loss and Damage fund in accordance with the Barbados Implementation Modalities.
Regarding biodiversity conservation and sustainable use, COP30 brought out the ‘Bioeconomy Challenge’ that aims for livelihood creation and economic growth through sustainable utilization of natural resources like forests and agricultural lands. On the side-lines of COP30, Brazil also announced the launch of its Tropical Forest Forever Facility, a blended investment platform, the returns from which will be used for rewarding countries that protect their tropical forests. The seed investors include Brazil, Germany, Indonesia, Norway, and France
All the efforts and initiatives had one thing in common—to reinforce equity and inclusion, mainly for indigenous communities. The Global Mutirao, the global collective framework adopted in COP30, explicitly acknowledges the rights of indigenous communities to a clean and healthy environment. The Intergovernmental Land Tenure Commitment, signed by 15 countries, seeks to recognize and legally protect 160 million hectares of indigenous or community-protected lands. Going beyond implementation and quantitative stocktake, COP30 presidency emphasized on Global Ethical Stocktake, which examines how just, equitable, and inclusive the global climate action is.
How has COP30 fared?
COP30 generated momentum but lacked binding mandates. It introduced new mechanisms to accelerate implementation and finance and also reaffirmed equity and Indigenous rights. However, weak NDC submissions and persistent finance gaps reveal a divide between ambition and action. The summit set a moral direction for climate governance, but limiting the temperature rise will depend on enhanced targets.
Information courtesy: UNFCCC, Carbon brief, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security, Ipsos, Reforest’ Action, Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (Brazil), UNDP, Earth Charter International, Climate Watch and others.
Photo courtesy: Internet
